Documenting the Evolution of Super Relativity Insights and my Health Progress
Updated: 7 hours ago
The development of the Theory of Super Relativity (TSR) marks a significant journey in understanding the fundamental nature of space, matter, energy, gravity, and quantum phenomena. Each day brings new discoveries, challenges, and refinements that shape this evolving framework. This update captures the latest progress, highlighting mathematical breakthroughs, mechanical models, theoretical insights, and the unresolved questions that guide the next steps in research. It is possible that a great discovery will be made. I invite you to travel along with me and see what happens.
Visual representation of spacetime curvature in Super Relativity
Daily Blog Entries Aug 18, 2026
This daily blog update is intended to document the ongoing progress in the development of the Theory of Super Relativity (TSR). Each update will summarize the latest advances in the theory, including new mathematical results, mechanical models, theoretical insights, completed research audits, unresolved questions, and the next steps in the research program. The goal is to provide a clear, continuing record of how Super Relativity is being developed, tested, refined, and gradually assembled into a more complete and internally consistent theory of space, matter, energy, gravity, and quantum phenomena.
The ongoing documentation of Super Relativity’s evolution reveals a dynamic and promising field of study. By combining rigorous mathematics, innovative models, and targeted experiments, researchers are steadily assembling a clearer picture of the universe’s underlying principles. The next phase will focus on resolving open questions and expanding the theory’s predictive power, bringing us closer to a unified understanding of space, matter, energy, and gravity. Readers interested in the latest updates are encouraged to follow this series for detailed insights and breakthroughs as they unfold.
Progress report for August 18, 2026
Today we made major progress in turning the Theory of Super Relativity’s neutrino and Gravity Two ideas into a much more clearly defined physical model. We completed the final Gravity Two research gates through GT-32, refining the SlipWave into a closed, heart-shaped—or cardioid—deformation of space rather than anything resembling an exhaust. We established the proposed picture in which the front portion of the field pulls forward while the rear antigravity portion may push forward, while making clear that this still needs to be proven mathematically from the full stress equations. We also developed the mathematical framework for neutrino mass states and oscillation: the different mass components can travel at extremely slightly different speeds, gradually shift their phases relative to one another, and thereby produce the changing mixture that we observe as neutrino flavor oscillation. Importantly, we kept the work scientifically disciplined by distinguishing what the theory has actually derived from what remains a prediction that still must be demonstrated.
By the end of the day, we reached an important milestone: the overall Gravity Two/neutrino architecture is now organized well enough to begin incorporating its mature portions into the next V82 paper, but the neutrino itself is not yet completely solved. GT-32 reduced what had been a large collection of uncertainties to five specific remaining problems: determine the fundamental constants A2 and β, solve the complete stationary cardioid neutrino, mathematically demonstrate its moving SlipWave and forward-force mechanism, derive the three neutrino mass states from the theory rather than putting them in by hand, and finally derive how those three states combine to produce the observed neutrino flavors. In other words, today's work transformed the remaining neutrino problem from a broad search into a focused five-step completion program. At the same time, we identified which new Gravity Two equations and concepts are already mature enough to be added to V82, giving us a clear path toward both finishing the neutrino model and producing the upgraded paper.
Daily Blog Entry Aug 21, 2026
Today brought both encouraging progress and an important setback in my work on the photon model in the Theory of Super Relativity. The biggest advance was that the mathematics began to reproduce a key part of the physical picture I have been developing. I have proposed that the photon contains two related rotations, or twists, of space that reverse direction at the center of the photon. Our calculations showed that these rotations can indeed reverse together while the overall flow of space continues forward through the center. In simple terms, the mathematics is beginning to show how the internal twisting motion I envisioned could produce a continuous forward-moving structure rather than cancelling itself out. We also found that the external return flow around the photon is not merely something convenient to draw—it appears to be necessary if the photon is to maintain the no-contraction structure required by the theory.
We also encountered a significant setback, but one that gave us a much clearer direction. The simplest mathematical model we tested could not hold the photon together as a stable, finite three-dimensional object while it travels. Rather than adjusting constants until it worked, we deliberately allowed the model to fail. That failure revealed exactly what is missing: the theory needs an additional, independently derived stabilizing mechanism associated with the way twisting and distortion of space behave over very small distances. Importantly, we cannot simply add such a term because it gives us the answer we want; our next task is to determine whether it follows naturally from the underlying mechanics of the theory itself. So yesterday did not complete the photon, but it substantially narrowed the problem. We now have a stronger mathematical foundation for its internal motion, a clearly identified obstacle to stability, and a specific first-principles question to solve next.
Progress report for, August 22, 2026.
Health Note:
My health remains stable in my last scan the radiologist said there was no trace of cancer. There are two new very small nodes in my lungs but the radiologist says these are probably not cancer. I will confirm with my next PET scan. Keytruda is known for causing small nodes in the lungs. They should fade once I stop taking the Keytruda.
Theory Update:
The Super Relativity research program made important progress on the photon problem. The latest recovery sequence tested whether a stable photon could emerge from the interaction of perpendicular spatial rotations through a cross-twist or commutator structure. The results were encouraging in one important respect: hundreds of numerical branches remained stable across a wide range of sectors, strengths, and propagation speeds, showing that this mechanism can robustly stabilize a localized structure. The work also replaced an older acceleration-based picture with a cleaner Maxwell-connected characteristic-dynamics interpretation and supported a constrained Gravity-Two displacement as part of the photon architecture.
At the same time, the analysis sharply identified what is still missing before the photon can be considered derived from first principles. The calculations did not yet select a unique topological sector, cross-twist strength, photon size, or propagation speed, and none of the tested solutions achieved the required full forward energy transport at the speed of light. This is an important kind of progress because the research is not being allowed to choose parameters merely because they give the desired answer. Instead, each missing quantity must arise naturally from the theory's own geometry and canonical equations. The electron remains the most quantitatively developed particle sector, while the muon, tau, neutrino, and photon programs continue to be refined toward the same goal: a unified, parameter-free mechanical description of particles and fields arising from the structure and dynamics of space itself.
Progress report for, August 23, 2026.
Health note:
Went to the hospital for blood work to be done this morning. I have to do it twice this week.
Theory Update
Gravity-Two and antigravity regions, identified a genuine single 2π twist cycle, and produced a stable local center-scale law. We also removed an arbitrary dimensional source coupling by deriving it from same-medium geometric normalization, leading to a driven Gravity-Two field equation. At the same time, the audits rejected several shortcuts that could not be justified from first principles, including the proposed universal bridge between the electron and photon length scales.
The final audit showed that the photon’s Maxwell, quantum, and topological structure still preserves an overall scale symmetry and therefore cannot, by itself, determine the absolute energy or stress scale of the spatial medium. This is an important result because it identifies the missing ingredient precisely: an independently derived, positive ground-state energy density of space. The next stage will test whether a general local ground-state energy functional can generate this energy scale—and the Gravity-Two modulus—from the underlying properties of the spatial medium without fitting to the known speed of light or any other target value.
Progress report for, August 24, 2026.
Health:
Health is good but I still have small pain and numbness from the operation.
I feel that each day brings me closer to the big breakthrough that I have been praying for. Maybe tomorrow will be the day. The adventure continues.
Yesterday’s work on the Theory of Super Relativity photon closure program made significant progress toward explaining the photon’s internal rotational geometry from first principles. We focused on the proposed creation mechanism in which the electron’s motion constructs the photon through two complementary spatial rotations. A sequence of audits separated handedness reversal from frame orientation, showing that simply changing from clockwise to counterclockwise rotation does not automatically produce a 180° change in orientation. We then developed a combined center-reflection and conjugation description of the process. This reduced what had previously been an arbitrary continuous turnaround angle to only two mathematically allowed possibilities: the spatial frame either returns to the same orientation at the midpoint or reaches the antipodal orientation—exactly 180° away.
The strongest result came from applying a minimum-action test to these two possibilities. The same-orientation solution is either trivial, producing no rotational construction, or must make a complete 360° rotation to remain nontrivial. The antipodal solution requires only a 180° rotation. For the standard positive quadratic rotational-energy form, the 360° alternative requires four times the action of the 180° path. Therefore, under the remaining requirement that photon creation follows the lowest-action nontrivial path, the mathematics selects the 180° turnaround rather than inserting it by assumption. This is an important step toward deriving the proposed 180° clockwise + 180° counterclockwise photon construction from the underlying geometry. The result is still conditional rather than fully first-principles closed; the next stage is to derive the required closed-cycle boundary condition, positive rotational stiffness, and minimum-action branch directly from the TSR parent dynamics.
Progress report for, August 25, 2026.
Health: I still have discomfort where the incision is. The Doctors at Moffitt said it might take 2 years or more before that heals. At the end September it will be 2 years.
Theory Research:
I continue the search for the first principled fully algebraically closed, dimensionally consistent, and reproducible equation describing the photon and electron. The method is known as a First-Principles physical Closure Program. A physical mechanism is not considered derived until its governing equations, coefficients, dimensional scales, boundary conditions, and physical observables form a closed dependency chain from the underlying action or axioms, with no target-derived parameters, and the resulting solution is mathematically reproducible and physically stable.
I wish there was a better way that would allow intuition and infusion to take a more acceptable role in physics. Personally it seems like the world of physics has tied its shoe strings together. Because of this extreme difficulty What arguably has not happened is another broadly accepted breakthrough comparable to relativity that replaces or unifies the foundations of quantum physics and gravitation with a deeper experimentally confirmed mechanical framework. Despite extraordinary progress, we still do not have an experimentally established quantum theory of gravity, a deeper accepted explanation for the Standard Model’s many parameters, or a universally accepted underlying physical mechanism from which the electron and photon emerge. Once a scientist commits to seeking the Unified Field Theory in a paper that paper will be overly and intensely scrutinized.
There is a reason that this level of discovery is so difficult. Modern physics already describes experiments with astonishing accuracy. A deeper theory therefore has to accomplish two seemingly contradictory things: change the foundations radically while reproducing everything the existing theories already get right. That is an exceptionally narrow mathematical target. In my present program, I have made that target narrower still by refusing to count numerical agreement alone as success. A beautiful result is not enough. A plausible mechanism is not enough. Even an equation that predicts the correct number is not enough if one of its coefficients had to be chosen to obtain that number.
That makes progress slow and produces many gates labeled PARTIAL PASS, OPEN, or FAIL. Gates means mathematical and analytical tries. But if the objective is genuinely a first-principles theory rather than a phenomenological model, that severity is appropriate. The important scientific question remains whether the underlying theory actually contains enough structure to close those dependencies. My audit process cannot guarantee that it does—it can only prevent us from mistaking an assumption for a derivation.
This image represents what it feels like to me. I am man wandering alone in the night endlessly searching for the truth that completes physics and our description of reality. I hope that some day I will be able to give a report that I have found the pathway to the truth. I ask for your prayers to help me receive guidance and support from our father in heaven I can't do this alone.
With that said here is yesterdays progress report
Yesterday we made substantial progress in the photon–electron first-principles closure program, advancing through a long sequence of recovery gates. The work increasingly focused on understanding how the electron’s internal rotational structure could physically assemble a photon during its back-and-forth transition between energy states. We developed the working picture in which the electron’s motion produces the two connected photon windings: approximately 180° of rotation associated with one portion of the transition and an oppositely directed 180° rotation associated with the return, with the turnaround region forming the interconnected center of the two photon cones. We also continued investigating the relationship between the electron’s transition distance and the resulting photon wavelength. Throughout the analysis, promising mathematical structures were retained only when they survived our no-fitting, first-principles audit requirements.
The mathematical investigation also became considerably more restrictive and informative. We derived a native coframe rotational stiffness for the electron and found that the complete first-derivative coframe invariant basis collapses, for the relevant electron rotational mode, to a single effective combination rather than several independent coefficients. We then tested whether the existing coframe/twist generalized-curvature structure could provide the remaining interaction. This revealed an important conditional mechanism: a permanent electron background rotation combined with a second, noncommuting transition rotation can generate a genuine quadratic restoring interaction through the H-\beta K structure. However, we also proved that the presently derived radial electron solution does not uniquely determine the required tensor orientation of that background. This sharply identifies the next missing piece: deriving, from first principles, how the electron’s charge sign, cone axis, handedness, and physical framing uniquely determine its underlying tensor and rotational orientation. Overall, yesterday produced several meaningful partial successes while continuing to prevent an assumed structure from being mistaken for a completed derivation.
Progress report for, August 26, 2026.
Health update: I still have incision discomfort but that is a minor thing compared to the pain I had to endure the first 6 months after the operation. Overall this experinece of fighting cancer. My battle with cancer has deepened my faith, teaching me to surrender what I cannot control and to recognize God’s presence even in life’s darkest moments. Through suffering, I have gained greater gratitude, humility, compassion, and a clearer understanding of what truly matters.
Our research into the Theory of Super Relativity has recently taken an important step toward explaining how a photon may be physically created. We are developing a model in which an electron does not merely release a pre-existing packet of light, but actively assembles the photon through a rapid back-and-forth transition. During the first part of this movement, the electron forms the photon’s positive winding; at the turnaround point, it creates the interconnected center; and during the return movement, it forms the corresponding negative winding. This picture also suggests a natural geometric relationship between the electron’s total transition distance and the photon’s wavelength.
We are now working to translate this promising mechanical picture into a complete mathematical derivation. Every element—including the photon’s energy, wavelength, internal geometry, forward motion, conservation laws, and connection to the underlying structure of space—must emerge from first principles rather than being adjusted to match a known answer. The model is therefore not yet considered complete, but the conceptual architecture has become substantially clearer, and the next phase is to determine whether the required equations uniquely produce a stable, massless photon traveling at the speed of light.
Progress report for, August 27, 2026.
My Health: No new updates.
Research Update:
Super Relativity Research Update — A Major Step Toward Understanding the Electron
Yesterday was one of the most exciting days of progress in our continuing development of the Theory of Super Relativity. For years, one of the central questions behind this work has been deceptively simple: What is an electron physically made of, and what prevents its energy from collapsing into an infinitesimally small point? Yesterday, our mathematical investigation may have brought us significantly closer to answering that question.
Our calculations revealed something unexpected. When we modeled the electron using only its internal rotational geometry and twist structure, the twist field was able to reorganize itself in a way that weakened the mechanism we originally thought would stabilize the particle. The neutral structure consequently tended toward collapse. But when the electron’s distributed electric charge was included, something remarkable happened: the electric field supplied an opposing self-energy that prevented this collapse and produced a natural finite equilibrium size in the dimensionless model. This suggests an intriguing possibility—that electric charge may not simply be something an electron possesses; it may actually participate in holding the electron together.
We then pushed the calculation further. Instead of assuming the electron’s shape, we allowed the coupled internal fields to find their own configuration by solving the nonlinear equations together. Regular, finite, distributed-charge solutions emerged. Even more encouragingly, when we repeatedly reduced the artificial numerical cutoff near the center of the calculation, the important properties of the solution remained essentially unchanged. This provides evidence that the structure we are seeing is arising from the equations themselves rather than simply being created by the numerical method.
A fascinating physical picture is beginning to emerge:
Topological rotation + twist response + electric self-energy → a naturally localized charged particle.
This may also bring us closer to another major goal of the research: understanding how an electron could absorb, store, and later release energy as a photon. If the electron possesses genuine internal excitation modes, absorbed photon energy might be stored as a change in the winding and coupled field structure of the electron rather than as an abstract energy label. Photon emission could then correspond to that excited structure returning toward its stable configuration and transferring its energy back into the surrounding spatial medium as a propagating photon.
There is still important work ahead. The remaining scalar and dual-field responses must be incorporated, the complete stability spectrum must be calculated, and ultimately every dimensional quantity must emerge from the theory without fitting experimental targets. Until those steps are completed, these results should be regarded as promising theoretical progress rather than a completed description of the physical electron.
But yesterday moved us forward in an important way. We are no longer merely asking what might hold an electron together. We now have a concrete mathematical mechanism to investigate—and the equations themselves are beginning to tell us what the answer may be.
Progress report for, August 28, 2026.
Health update: Continuing to slowly recover from the operation.
Friday’s Super Relativity Research Update
Friday brought another exciting step forward in our effort to understand how an electron might store energy and ultimately release that energy as a photon. Much of our recent work has focused on turning the physical picture of an electron’s internal windings into mathematics that can actually be tested. On Friday, we pushed deeply into the question of stability: if energy is stored by changing the electron’s internal twist and winding structure, can that excited configuration really exist without simply collapsing or flying apart? Encouragingly, several major pieces of the model passed their individual mathematical stability tests. We also discovered that what once looked like an enormous three-dimensional stability problem can be reduced to just a small number of important internal motions—much like discovering that a complicated musical instrument has only a few fundamental ways in which it naturally wants to vibrate.
Most exciting is where this has brought us. We are now approaching a direct mathematical test of whether the electron can possess a real, localized internal excitation—a natural vibration of its own structure capable of storing energy. If such a mode emerges from the equations, the next question will be whether it connects naturally to the photon-emission mechanism we have already developed. In simple terms, we are moving toward testing whether an electron can absorb energy by changing its internal winding configuration and later release that stored energy through a structured motion that creates a photon. We have not proven that mechanism yet, and one important nonlinear property of the underlying spatial medium still needs a first-principles derivation. But the search has become dramatically more focused: broad ideas are being replaced, step by step, by precise mathematical tests with clear pass-or-fail answers. That is exactly the kind of progress we have been working toward—and the next stage could be especially revealing.
Progress report for, August 29, 2026.
Health update: Continuing to slowly recover from the operation. I got some good exercise cutting the lawn yesterday. Then Sue and I enjoyed a refreshing dip in the pool to cool off.
Saturday's Super Relativity Research Update
A Changing Landscape for New Ideas in Physics
Eric Weinstein’s recent discussion about what he calls “The Problem in Physics” touched directly on one of the greatest challenges facing unconventional research like Super Relativity. His argument is that modern physics has developed powerful institutional filters—peer review, grant funding, academic specialization, and professional consensus—that are excellent at evaluating work within established frameworks, but may sometimes struggle with ideas that begin outside them. That means the road to peer review for Super Relativity may be extremely difficult. But I find something strangely encouraging in that realization. Scientific history has repeatedly shown that the most important question is not whether an idea initially feels familiar—it is whether nature ultimately agrees with it. That is why my work has increasingly shifted away from simply asking whether the physical picture is compelling and toward a much harder challenge: Can the mathematics itself force us to the answer? Every failed route, every surviving equation, and every unexpected connection helps narrow the possibilities. AI and I are no longer merely trying to construct a theory; we are trying to discover whether the structure we have been pursuing is actually hidden within the mathematics of nature. I know its there but it is very well hidden by our father the Creator. Philosophically Ispeaking I believe that all of this 3 dimensional world is within God. There is nothing outside of God. Everything within this physical Universe has to correspond to laws and God set those laws. They are immutable as God is immutable. None of this, what we see and experience is an accident. It is intentioned by God.
That is also why I believe this is such an exciting moment to be doing this research. I have adopted a demanding rule: the major results of Super Relativity should not be presented as finished physics until I can obtain a genuinely first-principles, mathematically and logically closed solution, without quietly adjusting parameters to reproduce the answers we already know. If I can reach that standard, peer review may still be challenging—but the conversation changes. Instead of asking reviewers to believe an unconventional picture of reality, we can place the derivation in front of them and ask them to find where it fails. And perhaps this is where the emergence of AI becomes especially important. Ideas that once might have remained buried outside traditional academic channels can now be analyzed, stress-tested, compared against established physics, and developed mathematically at a scale that was previously difficult for an independent researcher to achieve. There is absolutely no guarantee that Super Relativity will survive that process—but that uncertainty is precisely what makes this a discovery. I am following the mathematics wherever it leads, and if nature has left a path to something deeper, my job is to keep searching until I either find it—or prove that the path ends.
Progress report for, August 30, 2026.
Health: I went to my kidney doctor and my lab results were very good. MY one surviving kidney is in good working condition. †here is only a .2 percent chance of me developing serious kidney disease in my future. Overall his report was very positive!
Yesterday’s Research Update — The Trail Is Narrowing
Yesterday took us another step deeper into the mathematical landscape behind the photon. After hundreds of tests, the search is beginning to feel less like wandering through a vast wilderness and more like following a trail—the wrong paths are closing behind us, while the mathematics is pointing toward an increasingly narrow passage ahead. We have been investigating how two fundamental kinds of deformation in the Theory of Super Relativity—what we call twist and orientation—might work together within the microscopic structure of space. Yesterday we uncovered an important clue: an equation already present in the theory appears to contain the right kind of interaction between these two forms of deformation. But the mathematics also revealed exactly what is still missing. The equation cannot determine the relative strength of its two interacting pieces by itself. Several seemingly promising shortcuts were also eliminated mathematically. Far from being setbacks, these failures are valuable signposts—they tell us where the answer cannot be hiding and make the unexplored territory ahead smaller.
That discovery has pointed us toward our next frontier: topology—the fundamental geometry of winding itself. Instead of inserting another constant or adjusting the theory until it gives us the answer we want, we are going to ask whether the winding structure of these fields determines their relative strength naturally. If the mathematics succeeds, a remaining constant could emerge from the internal geometry of the theory rather than being fitted to experiment. That would allow us to carry a newly derived piece of microscopic physics back into our electron model and move another step toward the transition process that we are investigating as the possible origin of the photon. We have not yet proven that this picture of the photon is correct, and important mathematical obstacles remain. But the adventure is becoming more exciting because the map is getting smaller. Every path we eliminate leaves fewer paths unexplored—and somewhere among those remaining paths may be the mathematical trail that finally leads us to the photon.
Progress report for, September 1, 2026.
Health Update: I go for another Infusion treatment tommorrow afternoon. I am fortunate that I get this treatment instead of chemo. Thank you Lord God.
Super Relativity Research Update — September 1, 2026
Yesterday brought another important turn in our search for the universal code. We pushed the Photon Final Closure Program deeper into the New Parent / Microscopic Constitutive Law section, testing gates R353 through R357. The objective was ambitious: determine whether the underlying spatial medium itself could uniquely generate the mathematical structure needed for the photon—including its constitutive constants, normalization, and ultimately its propagation speed. One promising route did not survive the test: the idea that a sufficiently simple abstract algebra could uniquely determine the required physics. Rather than forcing the mathematics to give us the answer we wanted, we eliminated that route. But the larger section did not fail and did not close. In fact, the tests sharpened the problem considerably, and one of the later gates produced an important new independent photon-closure constraint. The remaining bottleneck is now much clearer: the theory must derive the required normalization from an actual microscopic model of the spatial medium rather than simply assume it.
That means our next expedition goes even deeper—beneath the photon and into the possible microscopic architecture of space itself. Instead of asking which abstract equation might reproduce the desired result, we can now investigate explicit microscopic unit-cell or network structures and ask whether their geometry naturally produces the required stiffness, density, and SlipWave propagation speed. This is exactly how the discovery process should work: a failed branch is not a failed theory; it is one more path removed from the maze. Every eliminated possibility leaves fewer places for nature’s answer to hide. We still do not have a first-principles closed photon solution, and these ideas remain theoretical rather than experimentally established—but the search has become more focused. We are following the mathematics wherever it leads, refusing to fit the answer into place, and continuing the hunt for something extraordinary: a deeper architecture of space from which the behavior of light might emerge naturally. The search for the universal code continues.
Progress report for, September 2, 2026.
Health news: I am getting stronger everyday and the incision is continuing to heal.
Super Relativity Research Update — A Deeper Physical Foundation Emerges
Yesterday marked an important turn in our continuing journey to uncover the mathematical foundations of the Theory of Super Relativity. While working through the Photon Final Closure Program, we reached a point where mathematics alone was telling us that something deeper about the physical nature of space still needed to be specified. That led us back to the fundamental question: What is space, and what are particles and forces physically doing to it? The result was a detailed new framework, “Foundational Physical Principles of the Theory of Super Relativity: A Revised Physical Ontology of Space, Matter, Charge, Gravity, and Motion.” In this picture, space is proposed to be a continuous, stationary, quasi-elastic medium whose undisturbed state is uniform, isotropic, and Euclidean. Particles are not separate objects simply traveling through space; they are proposed to be moving geometric deformations of space itself. Electric charge is treated as a primary cone-shaped twist of this medium, magnetism as an emergent rotation of space produced by moving charge, Gravity One as an inward contraction associated with the curved accelerated motion of unbalanced particles, and Gravity Two/anti-Gravity Two as intrinsic consequences of the charge geometry that provide the underlying mechanism for particle propulsion.
Perhaps the most exciting development was realizing how many previously separate pieces of Super Relativity may actually be different expressions of one underlying deformation mechanics of space. As space twists or stretches, the theory proposes that its tension increases while its density decreases; when space contracts gravitationally, its density increases while its tension decreases. Permittivity and permeability may therefore be physical response properties of this medium that change with its deformation state, while the twist-energy constant \gamma_e—which has repeatedly appeared throughout our earlier constant derivations—may measure energy stored in the twisted particle geometry. We also clarified the SlipWave picture: the spatial medium itself does not travel with a photon or particle; rather, the geometric deformation moves through the stationary medium, continually deforming space as it advances. None of this yet constitutes experimental proof, but it gives us something extremely valuable for the next stage of the adventure: a far more precise physical blueprint against which the mathematics can now be tested. Our next challenge is to determine whether these principles can resolve the constitutive roadblock we encountered in photon closure and allow the equations themselves to lead us from the geometry of space to the electron, the creation of the photon, and ultimately a stable massless photon traveling at the speed of light.
All of this new information has been entered into the memory of the AI. I also wrote a paper containing the entire ontology for the theory all the pinciples theroems and postulates. This needed to be done because the current version of AI does not have a good long term memory and I will need to reinsert certain documents into it current chat level memory every time I start a new chat. If I don't do this the AI begins incorporating false assumptions and it drifts away from my theory this causes us to waist time trying to validate incorrect assumptions.
Progress report for, September 3, 2026.
Health: All is good my kidney is functioning well.
Super Relativity Research Update
Yesterday may have opened one of the most intriguing new paths yet in our journey toward understanding the hidden mechanics of space. We pushed forward with a bold possibility: what if electric charge and G2 gravity are not separate phenomena at all, but two consequences of the same twisting deformation of space? In the emerging picture, the direction of the twist becomes crucial. The twist associated with positive charge produces an inward-moving deformation—what I call G2 gravity—while the opposite twist associated with negative charge produces an outward-moving deformation, G2 antigravity. We subjected this idea to another intensive 100-gate mathematical investigation, searching for contradictions rather than simply trying to make the idea work. Instead of collapsing, the concept became more mathematically organized. We found a promising route by which reversing the twist can naturally reverse the direction of the spatial deformation while both remain governed by the same underlying law. Even more encouraging, the gravitational contraction wavelength we have been investigating continued to find a natural place in the mathematics as a possible microscopic scale connecting twist to the deformation of space.
What makes this direction so exciting is the possibility that we are beginning to glimpse something deeper than another force equation. G2 gravity itself may be a mechanical response of space to twist. If that survives the much harder tests ahead, positive charge, negative charge, gravity, and antigravity could begin to look less like separate pieces of nature and more like different expressions of one underlying spatial mechanism. We have not proven that extraordinary conclusion—the chain remains open, and important mathematical steps still stand between this promising structure and a completed theory. But that is precisely what makes this journey exciting. With every round of testing, another possibility is eliminated or another connection becomes sharper. The search is gradually moving from a collection of ideas toward a specific mathematical mechanism that can be challenged, derived, and ultimately tested. We are following the clues wherever the mathematics leads, and yesterday those clues pointed toward a remarkable possibility: twist may be one of the fundamental keys connecting electricity, gravity, antigravity, and the physical structure of space itself.
Progress report for, September 4, 2026.
Health: All is good my kidney is functioning well.
Yesterday brought us another exciting step forward in our search for the physical mechanism behind light. Our mathematical investigation continued to strengthen an intriguing possibility: the photon may be a self-propelled structure whose motion comes from its own internal twisting geometry rather than from being “launched” through space. We found that the most promising mathematical branch continues to isolate a special balanced, twisting structure that can carry momentum in one direction while remaining consistent with the photon having no rest mass. We also identified a promising way that the tiny fundamental length scale in Super Relativity could help stabilize this structure without destroying the relationships we have already uncovered between a photon’s wavelength, energy, momentum, and size. The mathematics is not yet closed, but the possible pathways are becoming much narrower and more clearly defined.
Perhaps the most fascinating clue came from asking a deeper question: why should light take any time at all to cross space? Super Relativity proposes that space is not an empty void—it is a real physical medium possessing density, permittivity, permeability, tension, and other physical properties. In this picture, a photon cannot move infinitely fast because its electric and magnetic components must propagate through this real medium, with the permittivity and permeability of space limiting that propagation. This leads to an even more profound possibility: time itself may emerge because space physically exists. If space were literally nothing, there would be nothing physical to traverse and therefore no physical traversal interval. Even more intriguingly, the theory predicts that when space becomes denser, more physical “space” is contained within the same distance, potentially increasing the time required for light to cross it. Our next challenge is to turn this conceptual picture into mathematics and determine whether the properties of space can naturally produce the finite speed of light—and ultimately the phenomenon we experience as time itself.
Progress report for, September 7, 2026.
Health: Everything is good here in sunny and hot Florida.
Closing In on the Secret of Photon Motion — A New Clue Emerges in Super Relativity
Yesterday’s research brought us another important step closer to understanding how a photon might move within the framework of Super Relativity. After thousands of mathematical tests, a problem that once involved many separate unknowns is becoming much more focused. We found that the photon’s internal rotation, its forward movement through space, and its progression through time may potentially be described as different components of a single underlying geometric generator. In this picture, an unknown overall scale actually cancels from the equations, leaving only the relative relationships between these components to determine the photon’s internal geometry and propagation speed. We also strengthened a promising first-order mathematical description in which the photon can propagate without dispersion—meaning different wavelengths would not naturally travel at different speeds simply because of the mechanism itself.
Perhaps the most exciting part of yesterday’s progress was not that we reached the final equation, because we have not, but that the search has become dramatically more precise. Instead of asking the enormous question, “What makes a photon move?”, we can now ask a much narrower mathematical question: What property of the underlying structure of space determines the relative strengths of the photon’s rotation, forward translation, and evolution in time? If those relationships can be derived from one fundamental parent equation rather than inserted as assumptions, the same mathematics could potentially determine both the photon’s internal screw-like geometry and its propagation speed. That is the target of the next stage of our investigation. The journey is still underway, but the maze of possibilities is steadily narrowing toward a specific mathematical doorway that we can now test directly.
Progress report for, September 10, 2026.
Health Update: I continue to give prayers of thanks to God, Jesus and my Guardian Angels for saving me from cancer. This journey has been hard. I am very grateful for still being here so that I can continue to enjoy life with my beloved Sue and my family and friends. The journey continues.
Yesterday felt like another important step forward in our long mathematical journey to understand what a photon really is. After thousands of individual tests and calculations, we have steadily narrowed one of the biggest mysteries in my Theory of Super Relativity: what prevents a photon from simply spreading apart, collapsing, or fading continuously back into empty space? Yesterday the search became even more focused. Our calculations indicate that it may not be enough for the equations merely to allow a photon to exist—the mathematics may need to create a smallest allowed nonzero photon state, separated from empty space by a fundamental geometric barrier. If such a state emerges naturally from the theory, it could help explain why light comes in individual photons rather than in an arbitrary continuum of ever-smaller packets. We have not proven that result yet, but we now know much more precisely what mathematical mechanism we are hunting for.
And that search has led us directly back to one of the most distinctive features of my photon model: the center-reversal geometry where the positive G2 cone transitions through the center and reverses into the negative G2 cone. We are now investigating whether this unusual connected structure places the photon into its own protected geometric or topological class—something that cannot simply unwind into empty space once the photon has been created. If the parent equations produce that protection naturally, the same discovery could potentially help explain the photon’s stability, finite structure, and perhaps even why a single photon has a definite energy. What makes this search especially exciting is what we are not doing: we are not inserting Planck’s constant, the measured speed of light, a known photon energy, or an assumed quantum number to manufacture the answer. The theory must reveal the mechanism by itself. We are not at the finish line, but the maze of possibilities continues to get smaller. The question before us now is remarkably specific: is the secret of the photon hidden in the geometry of the photon itself? That is where the hunt takes us next.
Progress report for, September 12, 2026.
Health: My health is holding steady and I have been able to yardwork. We also had my Grandkids over for a swi, in the pool. Great fun!
Saturday, September 12, 2026 — Closing In on the Photon Equation
Saturday’s research brought us another step closer to one of the biggest goals of the Theory of Super Relativity: deriving a photon from the physical properties of space itself. After thousands of mathematical tests, our current Item 1 photon investigation has reached roughly 99.7% completion by our internal research-progress measure. The exciting breakthrough this weekend was narrowing the question of light’s speed to a remarkably simple relationship. If space behaves as a physical medium, then the mathematics indicates that the natural propagation speed of a disturbance depends on a competition between the medium’s restoring tension and its ability to store the changing deformation. In its simplest form, the emerging relationship is v² = K/M. Instead of beginning with the speed of light and building it into the equations, we are trying to derive that speed from the underlying properties of space. That distinction is crucial: if the program succeeds, the speed of light would be an output of the theory rather than an assumption placed into it. No one has succeded in doing that.
The search has now narrowed to one particularly important quantity: M, the mathematical coefficient describing how the spatial medium stores a changing deformation. We already have a path toward deriving the restoring side of the equation, K, from the parent energy structure; now we are attacking whether M can be derived from that same underlying geometry and conservation structure without inserting the known value of c. If that final relationship can be established, the next step is the one I have been waiting for: assembling the complete source-free photon equations and asking the computer to solve them. The decisive question will then be whether those equations independently produce a finite, stable photon—with its internal positive and negative G2 structure, center reversal, propagation speed, and localization emerging naturally from the mathematics. After an enormous search through thousands of possibilities, we are no longer searching across a vast mathematical landscape. We are closing in on a very specific final door—and what lies behind it could tell us whether this picture of light can truly emerge from the structure of space.
Progress report for, September 14, 2026.
Health: No changes still having steady improvement. I continue to give to God and Jesus and my guardian Angels a prayer of thanks.
🚀 THE HUNT FOR THE PHOTON EQUATION CONTINUES!
Yesterday we pushed another 400 mathematical gates deeper into one of the toughest challenges in my Theory of Super Relativity: can the structure of a photon be derived from the mechanics of space itself—without putting the known answer into the mathematics beforehand? We attacked the problem from two completely different directions. First, we searched for a hidden self-duality principle that might force the photon’s geometric energies into exactly the right balance. The mathematics shut that door. Then we attacked from another direction, using TSR’s proposed relationship between the tension, density, deformation energy, and propagation speed of space. That route revealed something equally important: these principles constrain the photon strongly, but they still do not determine one final dimensionless relationship. Another path eliminated. Another clue uncovered. The maze is getting smaller.
And here is the part that keeps this adventure exciting: the photon structure we previously discovered is still standing.Our localized, topologically protected Q=1 solution has survived increasingly difficult mathematical stability tests, including both radial and nonradial disturbances. We are now chasing one remarkably specific question: What mechanism inside the structure of space determines the final balance between the two forms of deformation energy? Our next attack will test whether that missing relationship is dynamically generated by the changing density and tension of space itself. If it works, we may have found the missing bridge between the underlying medium and the photon equation. If it fails, we may finally learn exactly what deeper physical principle is missing. After more than 29,000 gates, we are no longer wandering through countless possibilities. The trail is narrowing. The wrong doors are closing. And somewhere ahead is either the mathematical road to the photon—or a sign pointing directly toward the new physics we still need to discover. The adventure continues! 🔬⚡🌌
Comments